4 min read
No, your insurer does not require 14-day inspections
The claim
Search for home watch in almost any American second-home market and you will meet the same sentence, phrased a dozen ways: your insurance company requires the property to be checked every seven to fourteen days, or your coverage lapses.
It appears on operator websites, in industry checklists, and in aggregator content. It is usually stated without a carrier name, without a policy citation, and without any quoted policy language.
What we found when we looked
We went looking for the underlying document — any carrier publication, underwriting guideline, or policy form imposing an inspection interval on an unoccupied residence. Across the major US high-value personal lines carriers, we found none.
Chubb's published guidance on vacant and unoccupied homes recommends maintaining a consistent temperature of 55°F or higher, recommends shutting off water at the main, and suggests considering a property management company for early problem detection. It states no interval. The one 'monthly at a minimum' inspection recommendation we could locate sits in Chubb's Irish commercial-lines material, which governs neither US homeowners policies nor residences.
AIG's private client operation publishes risk-mitigation guidance without an inspection frequency. PURE publishes a device discount, not an inspection requirement.
Where it actually comes from
The seven-day standard is real. It is British. Unoccupied-home insurance in the United Kingdom routinely conditions cover on inspections at set intervals — most commonly every seven days, sometimes fourteen — with written inspection records required to substantiate them.
That requirement, detached from the market it belongs to, has become a talking point in American marketing. It is not a lie anyone invented so much as a fact that emigrated and lost its passport.
What the industry body says
The National Home Watch Association defines home watch as a visual inspection of a home or property, looking for obvious issues. Its accreditation standards require background checks, insurance and bonding, and verification of business licences at state, county and municipal level.
What its published materials do not say, anywhere, is that carriers require home watch, credit it, or accept it in satisfaction of any policy condition. The claim is not coming from the industry's own body. It is coming from individual operators' marketing.
What is true instead
The accurate version is narrower and considerably more useful, because it is checkable.
Every one of those can be verified against a statute, a policy form, or a carrier's own published material. None of them requires anyone to invent an inspection schedule.
Why we are telling you this
Because we sell scheduled property oversight, and this claim would help us sell it. We would rather be the firm whose statements survive being checked by your attorney, your broker, or you.
A firm that will repeat an unverified claim to win your business will repeat one to keep it.
Begin a conversation






